Archive for the ‘trademark’ Category

Subway Taking Action on “Footlong” Trademark

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

We’ve all seen the commercials featuring Subway’s catchy tune “$5 Footlong.” Subway is taking the fame they received from this new marketing scheme, however, and attempting to turn it into a trademark monopoly.  It has been reported recently that Subway is taking action by sending cease & desist letters to various food establishments, demanding them to stop using “footlong” in reference to sandwiches.

The nature of Subway’s trademark seems to be merely “descriptive,” and may be prohibited.  The Patent and Trademark Office is now considering the trademark. See a copy of the cease and desist letter here.

Jay-Z and David Ortiz in Trademark Dispute

Friday, April 16th, 2010

The well-known hip-hop artist, business mogul and rapper Jay-Z recently sued Red Sox player David Ortiz for trademark infringement. Ortiz recently opened a Dominican club in Santo Domingo bearing the name ”Forty-Forty,” prompting Jay-Z to file suit in New York on Thursday.

Reports state that Jay-Z alleges Ortiz is infringing on his  trademark and attempting to capitalize on Jay-Z’s fame and good fortune by using the same name of Jay-Z’s chain of nightclubs around the country bearing the name “40/40.”

Ortiz contends that the Forty-Forty name has nothing to do with Jay-Z, and instead refers to the feat of hitting 40 homers and stealing 40 bases in one season. Jay-Z currently owns 40/40 nightclubs in Manhattan, Las Vegas and Atlantic City. Evidence shows that Ortiz has visited at least one of Jay-Z’s 40/40 nightclubs in the past.

Lucasfilm Fights Trademark Infringement

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

The company that produced the “Star Wars” films is suing a Chicago billboard company in federal court for using the term “Skywalker” on billboards and on its Website.

Despite protests by Lucasfilm Ltd., Skywalker Outdoor Inc. has been using the Skywalker terminology, confusing fans and profiting from a term that has been trademarked since 1977, according to the lawsuit.

NFL Claims Rights to Saints’ “Who Dat?”

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

For decades, New Orleans Saints fans have belted out a cheer that has become part of their identity as much as crawfish and Burbon Street: “Who Dat Say Dey Gonna Beat Dem Saints? Who Dat? Who Dat?”

The National Football League, however, asserted rights to the phrase “Who Dat?” earlier this week through the Florida Department of State, not without confusion and outrage from Saints fans, and has issued cease-and-desist orders against New Orleans vendors who sell Saints memorabilia adorned with the wording.  The NFL asserts that the public will be confused into believing the memorabilia is sponsored by the NFL. The NFL further clarified that it is only seeking the rights to the phrase in relation to the Saints, and not as a whole.

The NFL is essentially claiming rights over “Who Dat,” a simple slang version of “Who’s that?” If a legally-recognizable line in the sand can be drawn between rights to a slang version of a commonly-used phrase, and the commonly-used phrase itself, where should the rights end?

Apple’s iPad Already Facing Possible Legal Trouble

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Apple stunned consumers this week with the unveiling of the new, cost-effective iPad. The device resembles a larger version of the iPhone, but contains more computer-like capabilities than the popular phone. The iPad name, however, could already cause legal troubles for Apple. A unit of Fujitsu, Ltd. claims to have a trademark on the brand, and issued a statement Wednesday saying it was reviewing its options with legal counsel.

McDonald’s in beef over trademark with Chicago teen

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Teen’s fund-raising fest sounds like infringement to hamburger behemoth.

Apple Resolved iPhone Trademark Conflict in China

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

The company that owned the trademark “i-phone” in China yielded it to Apple, removing what could have become a legal roadblock for the similarly named iPhone there.

Fort Lauderdale Trademark Attorney

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Trademark law is a niche area of law with many unique principles and requirements. Consequently, the service of an attorney who specializes in trademark law is required for many situations, such as to file a trademark application, evaluate a trademark search or trademark a product name.

Yet how should you choose a trademark attorney? To begin with, never pick your trademark attorney based solely upon a lawyer referral service or advertising. Lawyer referral services generally do not evaluate the abilities of the attorneys in their listings, but simply accept any attorney willing to pay the membership dues of that referral service. The referral service then refers clients to these “trademark attorneys” on a rotating basis. It is almost always the attorney’s own subjective determination that he or she is a “trademark attorney,” yet this attorney may have little experience and knowledge of trademark law.

Advertising is also a poor method for finding a trademark lawyer. Many trademark lawyers who extensively advertise run their practices like factories, with impersonal service and an army of paralegals preparing your trademark application. Instead, try to find a trademark attorney who provides individual attention to your trademark matters, including every aspect of trademark searching and trademark filing.

Inquire whether your trademark lawyer has experience registering trademarks in your industry. For example, a software company would be better served by working with a trademark lawyer familiar with technically complex products and how to appropriately describe the software in a trademark application.

Once you choose a trademark attorney, make sure you receive the high level of trademark assistance you deserve. A good trademark attorney will:

1.  Keep you informed of all major developments.

Whether it is examining a trademark search report, filing a trademark application, or defending you against a trademark infringement lawsuit, your trademark attorney should provide you updated information on the status of your trademark matters. For example, you should receive copies of a trademark search report conducted for you, copies of any correspondence to and from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and copies of your trademark application or trademark registration. Registering A Trademark provides all of its clients with copies of important documents and promptly informs you of any changes in the status of your trademark application.

2.  Quickly respond to your emails and phone calls.

Many trademark lawyers, particularly those with a legion of paralegals preparing trademark applications, will neglect to personally answer their client’s questions. Seek to find a trademark lawyer who is genuinely concerned about your trademarks and works to successfully ensure that your trademark applications mature to trademark registrations. Ask whether your trademark application and correspondence to the United States Patent and Trademark Office will be prepared by the trademark attorney or instead by one of his or her employees.

3.  Let you determine what trademark you will select.

The role of a trademark attorney is to examine the risks involved in using a particular trademark slogan or trademark logo and determine the likelihood of your trademark application becoming a registered trademark. Whatever trademark you choose to select is your decision and is generally based upon marketing goals. Often a client will seek to register a trademark that is risky to use or hard to register because the trademark is ideal for advertising. A trademark attorney examines a trademark search and provides a risk analysis, but the decision of how to proceed belongs to the client.

Court Won’t Hear Complaint About Redskins Name

Monday, November 16th, 2009

Court Won’t Hear Complaint About Redskins Name

North Face Threatens to Sue Teen for ‘South Butt’ Apparel Trademark Infringement

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

North Face Threatens to Sue Teen for ‘South Butt’ Apparel Trademark Infringement